"Orange Mocha Frappuccino's" ft. Kremy, Gideon, Hootsie, Gricko, Morning Frost, and Torbek from "Once Upon A Witchlight". Zoolander reference comments from episode 23 "Stumped".
@xxfiction-is-my-realityxx asked for Steve and Eddie hugging from behind, and an anon asked for kissing. So much like the 80′s I mixx-taped them both together for a cute kiss from behind ;P
CHAPPELL ROAN Attends the 2024 MTV Video Music Awards September 11, 2024
HANDS ARE GREAT HANDS ARE FUN TO I WANT THE ART COMMUNITY TO STOP DEMONIZING THEM THEYRE FUN AND EXPRESSIVE I LOVE HANDS
Even if i look like this when i draw them :
“We hope this email finds you well” babe, the only emails I hope find me well are the ones from Archive of Our Own
another one
IT IS DONE YIPPEE!!! 🎉🎉🎉 and now that it's done, i've decided to post it all together along with doing some mild touch up to past pages.
This was a ride to make and i'm extremely excited with all i have learned through the making of this comic >w<!! I'm not sure when this might happen, but you bet i'll be making more. Might be more EoM stuff or my own original work, we'll have to wait and see, first i wanna chill out for what's left of the year if you don't mind =w=;;;
Anyways enjoy the whole comic!
🐣
There’s a protest going on against AI art over on artstation, so I feel like now is the time for me to make a statement on this issue!
I wholeheartedly support the ongoing protest against AI art. Why? Because my artwork is included in the datasets used to train these image generators without my consent. I get zero compensation for the use of my art, even though these image generators cost money to use, and are a commercial product.
Musicians are not being treated the same way. Stability has a music generator that only uses royalty free music in their dataset. Their words: “Because diffusion models are prone to memorization and overfitting, releasing a model trained on copyrighted data could potentially result in legal issues.” Why is the work of visual artists being treated differently?
Many have compared image generators to human artists seeking out inspiration. Those two are not the same. My art is literally being fed into these generators through the datasets, and spat back out of a program that has no inherent sense of what is respectful to artists. As long as my art is literally integrated into the system used to create the images, it is commercial use of my art without my consent.
Until there is an ethically sourced database that compensates artists for the use of their images, I am against AI art. I also think platforms should do everything they can to prevent scraping of their content for these databases.
Artists, speak out against this predatory practice! Our art should not be exploited without our consent, and we deserve to be compensated when our art is exploited for commercial use.
Ash '91 she/her, introvert artist. Sometimes sfw/nsfw 🔞 forwarning
195 posts